Name: MO E-mail: (Not Available) Subject: Dispute!
First of all, Sully, may he rest in peace, died a year or two ago. It is his map though, and I give him due credit. Also I would mention that his dear wife Janice is still a dues paying member of this site.
Secondly, 87 ft (OR meters) doesn`t even qualify as a hilltop. If it does, that would be the only two digit hilltop elevation I`ve ever seen marked.
But even besides all that, if the top of the map could be assumed to be north, look to the south a bit and see a couple of 100`s. They have fewer contour lines than the one marked 187 - proving that the hill that (you say is marked 87) is higher elevation than the hills marked 100...that`s whether they`re measured in feet, meters, or inches.....which you can`t tell without a map scale/legend/key. (I don`t think they use ever use `meters`, but if you insist, they can if they want to.) Either way, you`re wrong and I accept your apology.
MO MMFIC
P.S. Your story revised, is posted. It`s a good one too.
